Visit Brian Ford's column >>

BRIAN FORDHome Page

Hrm?
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 332; Links Seeded: 409
Member Since: 11/2005Last Seen: 12/22/2009

How to be a Successful Journalist With No Prior Experience

(This is a picture.)

Photo by daniel sandoval. (License: Creative Commons Attribution)

Pull quotes which support your position are a great idea, if you need more pictures.

advertisement

Have you got two or three hours and a laptop? Then you can write a professional quality journalistic article without having any relative experience in the field.

Thanks to burgeoning "citizen journalism" sites, the line between professional work and amateur editorializing is blurrier than ever, and publishing your own thoughts for the world to read has never been easier -- from finding insider sources to typing out your views, to syndicating them and finally, building a sizable audience.

But many would-be amateur journalists still seem intimidated by the job. Although there are well over a hundred million blogs in existence, that leaves hundreds of millions of voices unheard. Chances are, your mom isn't blogging, and in the internet age, there's no reason she can't have a voice just as credible as those found on sites such as the Wall Street Journal.

So, here's a guide for regular joes looking to make the leap into journalism. We'll lay out all the steps you need to take to build your reputation as a serious journalist, and present some expert opinion about getting it read.

  1. SIGN UP AS A MEMBER ON A SOCIAL-NEWS SITE
    First, do some research. (Tip: This may also come in handy once you start writing your first article.) There are several "social-news" websites out there. One of those sites, newsvine.com, is owned by MSNBC, and is therefore a great place to start because it promises a massive built-in audience. There are other options, such as digg.com. Choose the environment in which you feel most comfortable.

    As you're signing up, it's a good idea to consider your screen name. The best part about journalism in the internet age is that it's very easy to pick a fake name, such as midwestmama and act as an anonymous journalist with just as much credibility as those in the mainstream media.

  2. THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU WANT TO WRITE ABOUT
    Don't worry about this step too much. Journalism in the internet age isn't really about content anyway. Suggested topics include: Barack Obama, celebrities, Barack Obama, your cat, John McCain's latest opinion about Barack Obama, and abortion. Whatever you write about is journalism -- citizen journalism.

    Don't forget to have fun.

  3. LEARN HOW TO LINK
    If you can format a link, you're 99% of the way to being an actual journalist. Often called "hyperlinking" or "using someone else's content as filler" -- all of the best journalists do it, and it's as simple as memorizing a bit of HTML:

    This is a hyperlink to an authoritative tutorial on creating HTML links.

    Most links start with "http" and are then followed by a webpage address. For now, don't worry about the meaning of http -- no one really knows anyway and knowing won't make your links work any better. The most important aspect of linking (as I've just demonstrated) is that you can present a topic and then link to someone else who has already written extensively on that topic, thus saving yourself a lot of time and effort. As journalism is about deadlines and speed, this may be the difference between repeating a story, and breaking a story.

  4. GATHER YOUR SOURCES
    At first blush, finding reliable sources may seem daunting. Not so! As Amy Chozick from the Wall Street Journal has shown, gathering sources and content can be accomplished simultaneously, with little or no effort. (Tip: Pay attention to what real journalists are doing as they sometimes spill industry secrets without intending to do so.)

    Say you want to write about Barack Obama's issues with weight. Specifically, you may think he's too thin and that other people may think this too. The trouble is, you don't have any sources or evidence to back up your story.

    Oh no! Time to move on, right?

    Wrong.

    The internet is teeming with possible "sources" and evidence is only a leading question away. Simply join an online community or forum and ask the question you want an answer to. In this case, you might ask:

    "Is Obama too skinny to be President?"

    Now, chances are fairly strong that several of the initial responses may not fit the story you want to write. Don't worry about those responses. Given enough time, someone will probably eventually answer "yes" to your question, and -- voila! -- an instant source. The only thing left to do is pick the most interesting affirmative response. Part and parcel of respectable journalism is using the best content, rather than all of the content.

    It's important to note that, without sources, your writing will have little to no credibility, so grab hold of anyone you can get. Mining for sources is a big step in earning your wings as a respectable journalist, and it couldn't be easier.

  5. JOURNALISTIC ETHICS
    For years, the largest obstacle to amateur journalism has been that pesky code of ethics that journalists are technically beholden to. Basically, that code is a bunch of gobbledygook technicalities about facts and truth which don't really apply in the internet age, due to several well-known loopholes. Take the following tidbit:

    "Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim."

    Journalistic ethics state that you cannot say this, and present it as a fact. But what about this:

    "Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim?"

    Perfectly acceptable. Now, you've presented an opinion and you've suggested a fact. Remember, you can post this question to a forum in an effort to gather sources and -- so long as even one person believes that Obama is a Muslim -- your article is real journalism.

    Quote that person, link to another website, and you've just completed your first article, not unlike one you might find in your local newspaper.

  6. GATHER YOUR FRIENDS
    As an individual, you're a lone voice in a sea of voices. For that reason, it's a good idea to gather several like-minded friends who will agree to collectively post content about similar topics.

    Congratulations: You've just upgraded to a collective and have achieved a instant boost in credibility.

    There are various benefits to pooling content but one of the biggest benefits is the sudden ease with which you can accomplish the linking step of being a real journalist. Ten friends equals ten possible links in support of your position.

    It's also possible to split your rhetoric down the middle: Five far right voices against five far left voices will allow you to claim "no bias, no bull" -- just like CNN.

    (Tip: Balance doesn't require centrist opinions.)

  7. UTILIZE PICTURES
    A nice looking picture -- any picture will do -- can add instant flavor to an otherwise bland article. Images are the "pearl necklace" of any successful journalistic endeavor. Like cilantro, they should be used sparingly -- not more than four or five per article.
  8. CHOOSE YOUR HEADLINES WISELY
    A carefully chosen headline may mean the difference between a large audience and an empty comment thread. Simple but true: The best headlines cause people to skip the content in favor of posting angry, knee-jerk, emotional reactions. Once one person has done so, the rest takes care of itself. Sit back, and enjoy the page-views.

    Journalists usually don't even write their own headlines, so learning to do this well will put you in a league of your own and will give you a step up against your mainstream competition.

There you have it. A few easy steps to becoming a journalist. Just remember, the real deal is a dying breed, and now is a better time than ever when it comes to stepping in and staking your claim on a piece of journalistic real estate.

It's almost impossible to do it wrong.

  • 68 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
90
57
18
6.4
{"commentId":2431929,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

Hat tip to Jeff Croft for pointing me to this bone-headed article, which inspired my own bone-headed article:

How to Create a Successful Web Site
For Nothing (or Almost Nothing)

{"commentId":2431929,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 14 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:31 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432632,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

Also, of note, I'm mocking the original article while also making a serious point about how lame some amateur journalism tends to be while also pointing out that a lot of mainstream journalism is lowering itself to a standard it supposedly derides.

This is a multi-faceted slam.

:)

{"commentId":2432632,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 16 votes
#1.1 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:55 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432695,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Brian, I'm glad you pointed me to that piece because the section on HTML gave me pause as I've taken flak - admittedly justified - for posting too many links and I wasn't sure if that section might be a dig at me and my ilk who link so much it's seen as self-promotion and gaming. Yes I'm defensive about it so I read more into that bit then was there.

Now that I see that was in the original piece I understand better. Either way I've vowed that if referring to a story, say, I only now link to the original rather than, say, my seed of it and generally try to just seed less.

{"commentId":2432695,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:02 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433403,"authorDomain":"transfer"}

Really funny stuff!

{"commentId":2433403,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"transfer"}
  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433414,"authorDomain":"wharrison55"}

Heh. Good sendup on what passes for "web journalism" most of which, my own pieces included, are really just opinion essays although some opinions are more equal than others. ;>0 Which is not to say that one cannot do real journalism on the web but unless one gets out and digs up sources like real reporters do, vets them, etc. then one isn't practicing real journalism.

{"commentId":2433414,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"wharrison55"}
  • 7 votes
#1.4 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":2436719,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Everything in this article sounds solid, with maybe the exception of these points:

'There are other options, such as digg.com. Choose the environment in which you feel most comfortable.

As you're signing up, it's a good idea to consider your screen name. The best part about journalism in the internet age is that it's very easy to pick a fake name, such as midwestmama and act as an anonymous journalist with just as much credibility as those in the mainstream media.

'

Digg is just a competitive website with a lot of junk posted. I would not go there to be a citizen journalist.

Screennames? Using a screenname isn't necessarily a good idea. In order to get indexed better by Google, and make a name for yourself, I think you should use your REAL name. Think of it this way: Famous writers have websites. They use their real names. Journalists use their real names, both online and in print. Really...when was the last time you read a newspaper or magazine article with the byline 'catlover 16'?

Other than that, I saw some pretty good advice here.

{"commentId":2436719,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 4 votes
#1.5 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:42 PM EDT
{"commentId":2436724,"authorDomain":"lele"}

I knew you were mocking something; normally you don't sound quite so happy...

{"commentId":2436724,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"lele"}
  • 9 votes
#1.6 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:42 PM EDT
{"commentId":2436936,"authorDomain":"spiffie"}

Other than that, I saw some pretty good advice here.

Swing and a miss.

{"commentId":2436936,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"spiffie"}
  • 7 votes
#1.7 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:04 PM EDT
{"commentId":2438677,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Robert, you did catch that this was a satire piece, right?

{"commentId":2438677,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 5 votes
#1.8 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:41 PM EDT
{"commentId":2438728,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Robert, you did catch that this was a satire piece, right?

No...I thought it was just really bad advice, but I didn't want to 'come down' on Brian too hard about it, so I just sort of ignored a lot of it and made a couple of points. I had just dropped into NV. Been busy all day.

I'm happy to find out it was satire.

{"commentId":2438728,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 4 votes
#1.9 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:48 PM EDT
{"commentId":2439159,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Even if you missed the tags didn't you read the comments like 1.1?

{"commentId":2439159,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
{"commentId":2440511,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

Okay, okay. He missed it. No big deal.

{"commentId":2440511,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 8 votes
#1.11 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:21 AM EDT
{"commentId":2445004,"authorDomain":"neoconstant"}

Nice article, Brian. You also formatted it very nicely (though you left that out of your list of good advice). That, too, is quite important. Aesthetically pleasing, easy to read, well-formatted articles are key (as is good grammar, spelling, etc.)

Good points, though. And isn't citizen journalism fun?

{"commentId":2445004,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"neoconstant"}
  • 3 votes
#1.12 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:55 PM EDT
{"commentId":2484492,"authorDomain":"davidmcgirr"}

Oh Ford you loveable @!$%#!
Well done.

{"commentId":2484492,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"davidmcgirr"}
  • 1 vote
#1.13 - Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:03 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2432140,"authorDomain":"stevencwatts"}

"Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim."

Journalistic ethics state that you cannot say this, and present it as a fact. But what about this:

"Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim?"

Ah ha ha ha...

{"commentId":2432140,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"stevencwatts"}
  • 11 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:58 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432159,"authorDomain":"jasonford"}

As you have written some actual self-help articles for Newsvine I thought this was a serious article at first. Half-way through I thought I had better check the tags. I was pleased to see "satire."

Nice.

{"commentId":2432159,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"jasonford"}
  • 10 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:01 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432492,"authorDomain":"onlineapps"}

Same here. Especially since you had just contributed a few links to a guy asking for help with citizen journalism.

{"commentId":2432492,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"onlineapps"}
  • 5 votes
#3.1 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432938,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

I was fooled at first, then I kept thinking, wait, wait, wait. And eventually I looked at the tags.

{"commentId":2432938,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
  • 7 votes
#3.2 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433460,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

Considering you read the initial article, Adam -- I'm surprised you were fooled by my parody.

{"commentId":2433460,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 5 votes
#3.3 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:22 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433568,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

Well, you didn't include anything as outrageous as this:

All you need to know is that a block of HTML — essentially, a bunch of gobbledygook words and symbols — can add extra features to your site.

And I did catch on around point 3 ;-)

{"commentId":2433568,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
  • 8 votes
#3.4 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2432310,"authorDomain":"deatienza"}

"Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim."

Journalistic ethics state that you cannot say this, and present it as a fact. But what about this:

"Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim?"

Hahaha.

Who says you can't just state that. For someone who claims to be tolerant, you're pretty intolerant. You Obamaphiles will just jump on anybody not towing your company line.

{"commentId":2432310,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"deatienza"}
  • 11 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432536,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim."

Journalistic ethics state that you cannot say this, and present it as a fact. But what about this:

"Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim?"

You know what's scary? I had a copy editor once who would turn every story into a headline question, partially because it was less passive but also I think either laziness.

The copy editors also write the headlines.

So I'd write about the council considering raising taxes.
The headline for the morning paper would be something responsible and safe:
Council talks of raising taxes or
Council may raise taxes

Then this guy would alter it for the afternoon edition:;
Council raising taxes?
or
Taxes going up?

It got to be a standing joke because he could turn everything - everything? - into a question and he would.

Mayor may be fired would become
Mayor fired?

{"commentId":2432536,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 9 votes
#4.1 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:42 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432690,"authorDomain":"deatienza"}

Those sound like SimCity headlines.

{"commentId":2432690,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"deatienza"}
  • 11 votes
#4.2 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:01 PM EDT
{"commentId":2432905,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

City hit by tornado?

Police inmate escapes?

Pentagon bombed?

Quick - which two of those three do you think ran in our newspaper?

{"commentId":2432905,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 4 votes
#4.3 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:24 PM EDT
{"commentId":2432989,"authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}

City hit by tornado?

My fave.

{"commentId":2432989,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"stolte-sawa"}
  • 4 votes
#4.4 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:33 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433098,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

If memory serves the first two of those three ran. I think the 9/11 headline was differnt.

We had a windstorm and there was a chance it might be viewed by some as a tornado.

Thus
Storm Hits Area - for the morning edition
became

City hit by tornado?

which could indeed also be a sim city headline.

{"commentId":2433098,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 4 votes
#4.5 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:44 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433192,"authorDomain":"deatienza"}

which could indeed also be a sim city headline.

And was every time I got bored...

{"commentId":2433192,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"deatienza"}
  • 7 votes
#4.6 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
{"commentId":2484537,"authorDomain":"davidmcgirr"}

"Look out there, here's your headline: Town threatened by storm"
"What if the storm doesn't hit?"
"...Town miraculously spared"

The movie had Kevin Spacey in it, was it The Weatherman?

Find out tonight on news at 11.

{"commentId":2484537,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"davidmcgirr"}
  • 1 vote
#4.7 - Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:10 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2432480,"authorDomain":"onlineapps"}

Suggested topics include: Barack Obama, celebrities, Barack Obama, your cat, John McCain's latest opinion about Barack Obama, and abortion. Whatever you write about is journalism -- citizen journalism.

You forgot, "Hillary Clinton is is not might be might not be is definitely not the vice presidential pick".

{"commentId":2432480,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"onlineapps"}
  • 7 votes
Reply#5 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:36 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432488,"authorDomain":"mscyprah"}

Great article, Brian. I LOVE the examples..Cheeky! :o)

{"commentId":2432488,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"mscyprah"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#6 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432498,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

This is excellent work, Brian. I too at first this was serious and was ready to clip it to the how to group. Instead I'lll clip it to Newsviner's Picks as this is hilarious. (oh and I see you DID clip it to the how to group)

{"commentId":2432498,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#7 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:38 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432523,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

I'm not sure if you read the link in my first comment, but my article is definitely more humorous with that background in mind. Scarily, the original article wasn't meant to be funny.

{"commentId":2432523,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 7 votes
#7.1 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":2432563,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

Off to read that link... left a comment from you above showing just how, sadly, this isn't too far from the truth even among "old" media.

The line asking if your mom was a news blogger did give me pause - "hmm, i've not heard from mom lately. If she is at newsvine and i didn't know it...oy!" - before I read on.

With my luck she'd be seeding 100 percent msnbc stuff and I'd have to read her the riot act.

{"commentId":2432563,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 4 votes
#7.2 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:45 AM EDT
{"commentId":2438678,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

I did not see the article as satire at first. I just sort of scanned it and was trying to be polite. But I had to object to the Digg reference and the idea that a username somehow works in citizen journalism. I don't believe it does. For one thing, Google isn't going to help your 'career' much if you go with a username, although a pen name is acceptable.

{"commentId":2438678,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 3 votes
#7.3 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:41 PM EDT
{"commentId":2439431,"authorDomain":"writingathena"}

Robert, your sincerity is very sweet. Don't let these snarky people scare you.

Brian, you are inimitable.

{"commentId":2439431,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"writingathena"}
  • 3 votes
#7.4 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:59 AM EDT
{"commentId":2439767,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Yeah...I should have checked the tags, as some other (insert 'smarter') folks did. It's kind of funny. I read the article, and then I thought: 'Geez...this is really BAD advice.' But, I didn't want to slam on Brian about it. I kept wondering...why would he write this stuff?

Now that I see it was a parody, then it made sense. Yeah...you fooled me.

{"commentId":2439767,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 2 votes
#7.5 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:43 AM EDT
{"commentId":2440386,"authorDomain":"writingathena"}

Robert, just so you know--every time you post a comment like the one above, you're still not getting the joke.

What they're making fun of is people who spend their time trying to figure out ways to get their blog/column/internet commentary to the top of search engine results--as if how high you come out in google were any measure of the quality of your writing or the reliability of your information.

In other words, the satire is not targeting bad SEO advice; it's targeting the sorts of people who care about SEO advice, who worry more about search engine optimization than they do about having anything substantial to say.

{"commentId":2440386,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"writingathena"}
  • 6 votes
#7.6 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:57 AM EDT
{"commentId":2449531,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Good writing, SEO, and Google ranks are not necessarily exclusive of each other. It's sort of a package deal. If you're going to spend the time trying to put out quality material...you may as well make the additional effort to ensure people find/read it.

{"commentId":2449531,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 1 vote
#7.7 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:47 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2433185,"authorDomain":"cpg"}

This is really good, but it needs more pictures.

{"commentId":2433185,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"cpg"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#8 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433225,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

Duly noted. Article updated to include a new picture.

{"commentId":2433225,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
  • 6 votes
#8.1 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
{"commentId":2433852,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

When I saw this piece today by Robert I immediately thought of this one. Ha.

{"commentId":2433852,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 3 votes
#8.2 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 2:07 PM EDT
{"commentId":2435361,"authorDomain":"cpg"}

Duly noted. Article updated to include a new picture.

LOL

{"commentId":2435361,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"cpg"}
  • 1 vote
#8.3 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:43 PM EDT
{"commentId":2438695,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

When I saw this piece today by Robert I immediately thought of this one. Ha.

Good, solid advice in that article. No satire. The system I describe in that article works, at least for me. I'm getting between 5-10 NV Link Love messages a week, sometimes more. Often, for some weird reason, they are finding articles I wrote like a year ago or more. Don't ask me how they (whoever 'they' is) do it.

{"commentId":2438695,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 1 vote
#8.4 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:42 PM EDT
{"commentId":2438761,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

What about cartoons? Are they good to prove your point? I heard you could make your own.

:)

{"commentId":2438761,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 3 votes
#8.5 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:54 PM EDT
{"commentId":2439043,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

I know you're being satirical there.

Cartoons? Sure. Tom Cruise, Michael Vick, Bill and Hillary, aliens, and others have been portrayed. My favorites are the Vick cartoons.

{"commentId":2439043,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 2 votes
#8.6 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:37 PM EDT
{"commentId":2439155,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}

I know you're being satirical there.

You think?

Isn't this whole article and discussion satirica?

{"commentId":2439155,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
  • 4 votes
#8.7 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
{"commentId":2439471,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Oh, sure. I use cartoons occasionally because they often can say more in a single panel than a whole page of text.

Toondoo

{"commentId":2439471,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 3 votes
#8.8 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:09 AM EDT
{"commentId":2451237,"authorDomain":"mock"}

satirica

Scott, is that something like 'ephemera'? Nice nounage!

{"commentId":2451237,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"mock"}
    #8.9 - Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:01 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2435010,"authorDomain":"lisaed"}

    Brian -- I particularly liked your point #2:

    Suggested topics include: (emphasis added) Barack Obama, celebrities, Barack Obama, your cat, John McCain's latest opinion about Barack Obama, and abortion

    Yes---that sounds like me......but to my credit I did try to mix it up a little (vas are you out there?) and write this week about John Edwards for a change......

    {"commentId":2435010,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"lisaed"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#9 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:06 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2435153,"authorDomain":"damiankd"}

    don't worry about the meaning of http -- no one really knows anyway and knowing won't make your links work any better

    that code is a bunch of gobbledygook technicalities about facts and truth which don't really apply in the internet age

    Images are the "pearl necklace" of any successful journalistic endeavor.

    No words. Laughing too hard.

    {"commentId":2435153,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"damiankd"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#10 - Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:21 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2439373,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}

    You're a genius and should have two RAV's to recognize brilliant wit and inspired citizen journalism

    {"commentId":2439373,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#11 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:46 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2439453,"authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}

    Brian, I was just thinking, the author's e-mail address of the original WSJ article is at the bottom of that article. I'm think they need to get a link to this here parody of yours ;-)

    {"commentId":2439453,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"thevineofhob"}
    • 6 votes
    Reply#12 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:04 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2441515,"authorDomain":"brianford"}

    Heh, if you want to send it to him, feel free. I certainly won't feel bad if his feelings are hurt, considering the article he wrote.

    {"commentId":2441515,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"brianford"}
    • 4 votes
    #12.1 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:36 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2439466,"authorDomain":"silkmesh"}

    Thanks Brian I will start right away. lol

    Pam yes I will vote for that too, Brian should get at least half a RAV but of course two would be better, lol and non lol.

    Good piece Brian and I am being serious.

    {"commentId":2439466,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"silkmesh"}
    • 4 votes
    Reply#13 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:07 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2440898,"authorDomain":"sonnetizer"}

    Muslim Barack Hussein Obama: Too Skinny to be American?

    {"commentId":2440898,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"sonnetizer"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#14 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 9:18 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2441568,"authorDomain":"JessWondering"}

    Journalistic ethics? Say what?

    {"commentId":2441568,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"JessWondering"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#15 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:41 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2441878,"authorDomain":"caesara"}

    Maybe having no prior experience as a journalist is better than having much prior experience as a BAD journalist.

    One ethics point that is always met with this citizen journalist thing is: "Don't in turn parrot on the air or in your writings what some producer (or editor) is parroting from some flack or hack they have as a go-to source."

    {"commentId":2441878,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"caesara"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#16 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:12 AM EDT
    {"commentId":2444384,"authorDomain":"MissDev"}

    Brian -

    Thanks! I was so worried about being able to be a strong citizen journalist while covering the DNC. Now you've really given me some great tips.

    You're my hero.

    {"commentId":2444384,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"MissDev"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#17 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:04 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2444484,"authorDomain":"bakerismo101"}

    As a journalism student I saw light. Then I read the article and thought I was well on my way for the pulitzer, until the ethics point showed. Thats your basis for credibility. No joke; I was fooled! Touche

    {"commentId":2444484,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"bakerismo101"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#18 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:11 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2446269,"authorDomain":"benjaminstraight"}

    And the web eats all of it up.

    {"commentId":2446269,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"benjaminstraight"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#19 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:46 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2446545,"authorDomain":"MRZK"}

    FOX News: Help wanted - Empty headed blondes to read teleprompters rife with propaganda pieces. Ability to feign various facial expressions (surprise / shock / cynicism / intelligence) required. Ability to interrupt, talk over and ridicule guests with opposing opinions a real plus. Must show ability to jump to conclusion and unwillingness to back down in light of facts or scientifically-derived evidence.

    {"commentId":2446545,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"MRZK"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#20 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:10 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2447813,"authorDomain":"djehuty"}

    Yes.

    Wanted: Public to take this crap seriously. Oh wait we've got that ;)

    {"commentId":2447813,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"djehuty"}
    • 8 votes
    #20.1 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:32 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2449555,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

    All positions (at Faux) have now been filled with the qualified applicants...

    {"commentId":2449555,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
    • 4 votes
    #20.2 - Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:50 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2450649,"authorDomain":"wmdavid"}

    Fox News really news?

    {"commentId":2450649,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"wmdavid"}
    • 1 vote
    #20.3 - Thu Aug 14, 2008 3:30 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2447830,"authorDomain":"gobbledegook"}
    gobbledegookDeleted
    {"commentId":2447924,"authorDomain":"gobbledegook"}
    gobbledegookDeleted
    {"commentId":2447956,"authorDomain":"gobbledegook"}
    gobbledegookDeleted
    {"commentId":2450021,"authorDomain":"fakirscanada"}

    You're very funny - and helpful - a rare combo on the Net or anywhere. Dry humour is uncommon these days - maybe because it takes intelligence and thought to pull it off.

    {"commentId":2450021,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"fakirscanada"}
      Reply#24 - Thu Aug 14, 2008 1:01 AM EDT
      {"commentId":2450280,"authorDomain":"ddaSedN"}
      ddaSedNDeleted
      {"commentId":2451001,"authorDomain":"barry-rutherford"}
      {"commentId":2451001,"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998","authorDomain":"barry-rutherford"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#26 - Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:48 AM EDT
      {"canLink":false,"threadId":"330395","isPrivate":false}
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      {"threadId":"330395","contentId":"1741998"}
      Start TrackingStart Tracking
      Stop TrackingStop Tracking